Sprint Review

A Sprint Review is an important artifact of the Scrum-framework within Agile software development. It is a formal meeting at the end of each sprint in which the development team and the Product Owner presents the delivered increment of the product to stakeholders, such as, management, the customer and possibly the end user. We will further explain the concept of Sprint Review, highlight its purpose, discuss the key attendees and roles, and cover some challenges with related tips.

Purpose Sprint Review

The purpose of a Sprint Review is twofold. First, it serves as a showcase of the work completed during the sprint. The team presents the increment of the product, showing which user stories were completed and which features were added. This provides an opportunity for stakeholders to review progress, provide feedback and discuss any changes or additional requirements for the next sprint. Second, it is an opportunity to strengthen collaboration between the development team and stakeholders, and create a sense of transparency and trust.

Who attends a Sprint Review?

At a Sprint Review, certain stakeholders must be present. This includes at least the development team, the product owner, the Scrum Master and other stakeholders such as management, user representatives or customers. It is essential that the right people are present so that relevant discussions can take place and decisions can be made.

Attendee responsibilities during a Sprint Review

During a Sprint Review, different roles have specific responsibilities. The development team presents the delivered increment and answers questions from stakeholders. The Product Owner evaluates whether the increment meets the stated acceptance criteria and determines if it is ready for release. The Scrum Master facilitates the meeting and ensures it runs smoothly. Other attendees have the role of observers and provide feedback and input based on their expertise.

The Challenges of a Sprint Review

While the Sprint Review is a valuable meeting, it can also present challenges. A common challenge is limiting the length of the review and avoiding overly detailed technical discussions. To avoid this, it is important to keep the focus on the increment presented and the acceptance criteria set. In addition, it can be difficult to engage all stakeholders and ensure that they actively participate in the discussions. It is advisable to communicate expectations in advance and value everyone's input.

To facilitate an effective Sprint Review, here are some tips:

  1. Prepare the presentation carefully: Ensure that the development team presents the delivered increment clearly and convincingly, emphasizing the added value to users.
  2. Encourage active participation: Encourage stakeholders to ask questions, provide feedback and make suggestions. Create an open and inclusive environment where everyone's voice is heard.
  3. Keep focus on goal: Make sure discussions remain focused on the presented increment and acceptance criteria. Limit technical discussions to a later time if necessary.
  4. Include feedback in the product backlog: Collect all feedback received and incorporate it into the product backlog. This ensures that important insights and requirements are incorporated into future sprints.

A well-organized Sprint Review allows Agile teams to evaluate project progress, gather feedback and determine next steps. It is a crucial opportunity to promote transparency and collaboration, contributing to the successful delivery of valuable products. Download here an Agenda template for a sprint review. 

Starting an Agile transition?

In our roadmap, read the key stages including practical tips for a successful transition to an Agile Way of Working.